Let’s say the cost of a compliance program is $12,000 per year. Is it expensive?
The answer depends on what it replaces.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be a wise investment. It would be a different calculation in the event that a small group of people could collect the same amount of evidence in just the time of a few minutes every month.
That’s a useful method to begin your search for a Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the greatest features is not the first step. Ask how many hours and time these features can save your business.
The Break-Even Point of Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. Scale changes its value. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is growing, numerous cloud environments, numerous applications and frequent changes in access. The burden of manually collecting evidence on a regular basis could be very excessive. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence could easily justify their cost.
Take a look at a startup that has 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. Its infrastructure might be compact, and the evidence collection is still manageable even without the need for extensive automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. Although a sophisticated platform may have many features but they only have value when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a discussion that is a simple feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the features, services, contracts and quotes of each platform. Both are reputable compliance platforms that concentrate on integrations and automation.
There’s a second decision to take before that. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the Same Model
Many Vanta competitors are also in the same category, which focuses on automation. There are also lighter platforms designed around organizing rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist falls into the latter category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors can examine the documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers select and upload the evidence they want to present.
The consideration of access to the System in the Making
The elimination of integrations does not come without its limitations: one must take the time to collect evidence.
It also gets rid of integration setup and means the compliance application does not require standing connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to each other. Which choice is best for your company?
CertAssist targets teams that have between five and 200 people. The pricing of the service is announced rather than requiring the salesperson to obtain the initial figure. The price for the initial launch is $225 a month, which is comparable to the usual price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
The requirements of a 10 person start-up today might not necessarily match its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
A lightweight platform can be beneficial while compliance stays easy. As systems, employees, frameworks, and evidence requirements grow, the economics will ultimately favor more automation. This is a better way to acquire compliance technologies: let complexity earn its rightful place.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look good in a table of comparisons isn’t worth it. They are worth paying for when doing the tasks they automate is more expensive as compared to manually performing them.